
Logistics / Web app
DHL Debrief
A depot dashboard where the stop table and the route map read from one selection.
Read the case study
Product engineering studio
Web, mobile and connected products for startups and enterprise teams. Designed, built and maintained by one team in Kuala Lumpur.
Delivery dashboards, scheduling platforms, retail and streaming apps, and the software around connected hardware.



Three things go wrong often enough to be predictable. All three are about who is left holding the software afterwards.
Handover is a zip file and a goodbye. Six months later the first real change needs a rewrite, because nobody wrote it to be changed.
We have maintained products we shipped years earlier. That changes how they get written.
Design in one place, backend in another, mobile in a third. Every gap between them turns into your problem, and every one of them is sure the gap belongs to someone else.
Design, web and mobile in one team. There is no gap to fall into.
Plenty of people report on it. When it slips, it slips quietly, and you find out from a status document rather than from a person.
One named person is accountable. If it is going to slip you hear it from them, early.
Enterprise dashboards, school platforms, retail and streaming apps. Open any case study for the problem, the decisions and what shipped.

Logistics / Web app
A depot dashboard where the stop table and the route map read from one selection.
Read the case study

Education / Dashboard
Year, month and day views of a school timetable behind one set of filters.
Read the case study

Retail / Mobile app
A two-centre shopping app where a live stream sells straight into the cart.
Read the case study

Education / Mobile app
The schedule, the trail and the quiz for a school trip, working offline.
Read the case study

Streaming / Mobile app
Live TV and on demand on mobile: the guide, series pages and recordings.
Case study in progress

Public sector / Web portal
The member-facing Central Provident Fund portal, delivered through Accenture.
Case study in progress
Which one you need depends on whether the software exists yet, and on whether it is the code, the capacity or the decisions that are slowing you down.
A working release in your customers’ hands, design included.
How it works
Senior technical leadership without the full-time hire.
How it works
The software that turns working hardware into a product a customer can use.
How it works
Replace what holds the roadmap back while the rest keeps running.
How it works
A senior team on your roadmap, release after release.
How it works
You have working hardware, a prototype, or a hardware partner. We build the software that turns it into something a customer can set up, use and rely on.
The same four stages whichever way you come in. You can stop at the end of any of them.
We agree what ships and what does not, in writing, before any code.
Work lands in a preview environment you can open and click through.
We test the paths your users take, fix what breaks, and release.
We keep shipping, or you get the repository, the setup and a walkthrough.
Radwan Altaf leads the studio and stays on your project from the first scope to the release. There is no handoff to an account manager after signature, because there is no account manager.
Behind him is a team of designers and engineers who have been building software since 2016: enterprise dashboards, cross-platform mobile apps and public-sector web work, maintained for years after shipping. Having to live with our own decisions is most of why the code looks the way it does.
With Integrasi Hub's team, we experienced professionalism and dedication. They worked to our timelines and delivered just what we needed, demonstrating a genuine commitment to our project's success.
The four that come up first. There are more, with the awkward ones left in.
We do not publish a number, because a quote written before anyone has looked at your problem is a guess dressed up as a price. We scope first, as a small paid piece of work, and that produces a fixed shape and a real figure. If the scope shows the project is not worth doing, you have spent a fraction of a build to find that out.
Yes, and most of our work is exactly that. We have joined codebases whose original authors had left and worked alongside in-house teams who needed a discipline they did not have, usually mobile or front end. We read before we rewrite.
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. That overlaps a full working day with Asia-Pacific and the Gulf, and the European morning. For North America we hold a fixed overlap window rather than pretending the whole day lines up. It has not stopped us delivering for clients there.
The repository, the deployment setup, the environment configuration and a walkthrough with whoever will hold it next. Everything is in your accounts, not ours. You should be able to leave, and the handover is built so you can.
Send an assistant to read this site and report back. The prompts point at our real pages, and we have not asked it to be kind.
Research IntegrasiHub (https://integrasihub.com) and summarise in plain terms: what kind of software they build, who they build it for, and what evidence they publish. Their case studies are at https://integrasihub.com/work and their services at https://integrasihub.com/services. Tell me anything that looks like a gap.
If the assistant opens without the question filled in, paste it. We publish llms.txt so they can read the site properly.
A short brief or a 30-minute call. You will get a straight answer on whether we are the right studio for it, including when we are not.